Articles and materials offered by the EPS

EPS Article Library

An Aristotelian-Thomist Responds to Feser

I argue that Edward Feser misconstrues the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition on issues relevant to the arguments for God’s existence that proceed from finality in nature because he misapplies the A-T view that ordering to an end is inherent in natural things: (1) Feser speaks as if human action in no way serves as a model for understanding action for an end in nature; (2) he misreads, and ultimately undermines, the Fifth Way, by substituting intrinsic end-directedness in place of end-directedness; (3) he overlooks striking similarities between Paley’s argument from design and the Fifth Way. He also fails to consider the role of the good in the Fifth Way.

To read the full-text of this article, please click here.

Neuroscience and the Soul Christian Philosophers and the Secular Academy Subscribe to Philosophia Christi - click here.