Evangelical Philosophical SocietyArticle Reprint

Christian Philosophy without Sociology: Reply to Tedla Woldeyohannes

by Paul K. Moser

This is a reply to Tedla Woldeyohannes, “On Moser’s Christ-Centered Metaphilosophy.” It draws a distinction between philosophy (particularly, Christian philosophy) and the sociology of philosophy (including the sociology of Christian philosophy), in order to propose that empirical questions about what most contemporary Christian philosophers are or are not doing belong to statistical sociology and not philosophy or Christian philosophy proper.

One important lesson is that Christian philosophy itself need not supply, and should not be expected to supply, answers to the statistical sociological questions one might have. Another important lesson is that Christ-Shaped Philosophy calls for certain specific reorientations in philosophy as commonly practiced, even by Christians. The paper identifies three areas for reorientation.

The full-text of this contribution is available for FREE by clicking here.

©2021 Evangelical Philosophical Society. All rights Reserved.  

This article is made public for personal, non-commercial use only.  You must obtain prior written permission for any other use.  The Evangelical Philosophical Society  (EPS) is an organization of professional scholars devoted to pursuing philosophical excellence in both the church and the academy. Interested laypersons can join as full, associate, or student members.  The EPS journal, Philosophia Christi, is a scholarly publication containing discussion of a variety of topics that are of interest to the philosopher and to the philosopher of religion.

For membership information, please visit www.epsociety.org or you may contact us by phone or e-mail.