Beyond Spectator Evidence to Pneumatic Evidence: Reply to Charles Taliaferro

Charles Taliaferro has suggested that the epistemology underlying my approach to Christ-shaped philosophy is unduly negative toward natural theology.

This reply identifies a problem with the cogency of natural theology that underwrites my negative stance toward it.

The reply also motivates my view of pneumatic evidence for God, and suggests that such evidence is unduly neglected by philosophers.

In addition, my reply counters an objection from Taliaferro regarding my approach to death.

The full-text of this contribution is available for FREE by clicking here.