Ramified Natural Theology, the Moser Way?

Dr. James Henry Collin, PhD

Paul Moser’s vision for philosophy has both a positive and a negative component. The positive component is a reorientation of philosophical practice around wisdom and moral transformation; the negative component is a criticism of much philosophy, including natural theology, as being at odds with this.

Moser has leveled a challenge to produce a plausible piece of natural theology which is not deficient in this respect. Here I attempt to do exactly that. I defend a version of the moral argument which does not presuppose moral realism of any sort.

The full-text of this contribution is available for FREE by clicking here (updated 08-28-14)