Replies to Moser and Di Ceglie on Christ-Shaped Philosophy
This paper continues the discussion on “Christ-Shaped Philosophy,” as advanced by Paul Moser’s paper.
Helpful comments from Paul Moser and Roberto Di Ceglie suggest–to me–a need for sharpening my previous response.I try to do this here.
I see a prima facie tension between three claims that Moser makes for “Christ-shaped philosophy”:
- “Christ-shaped philosophy is distinctive in virtue of its content”;
- “Christ-shaped mathematics” is not distinctive in virtue of its content;
- “Christ-shaped philosophy” is a model for “Christ-shaped mathematics”.
I do not yet see how Moser proposes to resolve this prima facie tension.
The FREE full-text of this paper is available for downloading by clicking here.