How Not to Defend Natural Theology: Reply to Woldeyohannes Dr. Paul K. Moser, PhD For the Christ-Shaped Philosophy discussion, Moser responds to the latest objections against his critique of natural theology. Read more
Given the Evidence, Natural Theology is Here to Stay! Dr. Tedla G. Woldeyohannes, PhD Tedla Woldeyohannes responds to Paul Moser’s recent objections against a particular approach to natural theology. Read more
Paul Moser and the Antecedent Belief Criticism Mr. R. Daniel Dake, PhD Candidate R. Daniel Dake contributes both to the “Christ-shaped Philosophy” project and to recent Philosophia Christi discussions on Moser’s epistemology Read more
Gethsemane Epistemology, Pneumatic Evidence, and Divine Agape?: Reply to Aaron Preston Dr. Paul K. Moser, PhD Moser replies to Preston on whether Read more
On the Purported Superiority of Gethsemane Epistemology Dr. Aaron Preston, PhD Aaron Preston assesses the value of Moser’s “Gethsemane epistemology” when compared to alternatives like natural theology. Read more
Introduction to a Special Issue of Philosophia Christi on Ramified Natural Theology Dr. Angus Menuge, PhD; Dr. Charles Taliaferro, PhD Learn more about the unique Winter 2013 issue of Philosophia Christi on Ramified Natural Theology, along with ongoing discussions on this topic at the EPS website Read more
The Contingency Problem: Why Human Rights Cannot be Naturalized Dr. Angus Menuge, PhD What are the problems with human rights being naturalized? Angus Menuge explores this question in this precis of his recent chapter contribution to Read more
Fall 2013 EPS President’s Update Dr. Angus Menuge, PhD Learn more about some of the latest news from the EPS Read more